Acting D.C. Public Schools Chancellor Kaya Henderson asked the city’s inspector general Tuesday to investigate potential cheating in eight schools on the city’s standardized reading and math exams.

But Henderson maintained that the probe into schools — where performance jumped alongside unusual erasure patterns on the exams — is being commissioned only to underscore that no cheating took place and the results of former Chancellor Michelle Rhee’s reforms are real.

“We know our schools are improving,” Henderson said. “Our children are learning, and I want the public to share our confidence.”

I’m a big fan of KH’s moves so far, in her leadership of DCPS.  Michelle Rhee, on the other hand, could still use some PR lessons, in the aftermath of this report.  

The style of the messenger, not just the message, makes a difference, especially when you’re trying to build credibility in a public enterprise, such as education.

After Baltimore City teachers vote down contract, Alonso kills ‘em with kindness (or at least mutual respect)

Another example of how Andres Alonso in Baltimore is using mutual respect, even in the face of adversity, to improve relations with teachers and reform public education in the city schools (via Baltimore’s ABC2News).

The city school’s CEO, Dr. Andres Alonso, released a statement, which read: ‘This contract makes a historic shift in how teachers are compensated, in the district’s ability to attract and retain excellent teachers, and in the ability of schools to shape key aspects of school operations. These are essential elements of how we as a district will move forward. Many teachers wanted more information about all the dimensions of the contract and more time to digest what it would mean. I respect the seriousness with which teachers approached the vote and the importance of the questions they have raised. The high turnout for the vote reflects the importance of the contract and the value that teachers place on their work. We are committed to working with teachers until all who voted against the contract understand its benefits or we agree on other conditions that are just as necessary for our schools to move forward as our kids deserve.’

It’s difficult to imagine this kind of gracious statement coming out of the Michelle Rhee administration in DCPS—though her resignation remarks were quite impressive on Wednesday. We’ll see if the tone in DC changes under interim chancellor Kaya Henderson.  If last night’s Vince Gray town hall in Ward 2 was an indication, then mutual respect may be the new name of the game.  

(Previous thoughts on Rhee vs Alonso, in terms of style, can be found here)

Gray’s first move, from Washington Post:

Presumptive mayor-elect Vincent C. Gray introduced Kaya Henderson on Wednesday as the interim chancellor of D.C. public schools and vowed that reforms launched under Michelle A. Rhee would continue when he takes office in January.

“We cannot and will not return to the days of incrementalism,” said Gray, appearing at a news conference with Rhee, Henderson and Mayor Adrian M. Fenty, who will formally appoint Henderson at Gray’s request.

Later in the day, Gray, the D.C. Council chairman, met privately with Henderson for more than 90 minutes in his office in the John A. Wilson Building. They were joined for part of the time by Chief Financial Officer Natwar Gandhi, perhaps signaling that Gray and Henderson are already grappling with issues related to the District’s large budget shortfall.

Gray and Henderson hugged as the meeting broke up. Gandhi declined comment as he left, and Henderson said she needed “fifteen minutes to breathe.”

“A lot has happened today,” she said, adding she will begin formal media interviews within a few days.

In Henderson, Gray inherits someone in tune with Rhee on the fundamentals of education reform, especially the belief that teacher quality is the most important determinant of student success. Rhee and Henderson worked together at the New Teacher Project, a teacher recruiting nonprofit group that Rhee founded and ran before she was appointed by Fenty in June 2007. Henderson was a vice president for the group.


Thoughts on Michelle Rhee and Vince Gray’s next move

 iwasjustsayin replied to your link:D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee to announce resignation Wednesday (WaPo)

What is Vince Grays vision?

That is the big question, and here are my quick thoughts (in as many complete sentences as I can pull together at 10 p.m.).  

In the campaign, Gray made his arguments about style, rather than about changing specific policy decisions made by Rhee or Fenty.  Here’s the quick blurb from the Post:

Gray has repeatedly said that he supports an ambitious program of school reform but does not think that changes depend on a single person. In aninterview with The Washington Post last week, he said that if Rhee leaves, he will seek to name a replacement who shares many of her values and not a veteran who has spent several decades in top school jobs. He ruled out Rhee’s predecessor, Clifford Janey, whose name had circulated as a possible replacement.

While I think Gray will take his time and consider young talent, I still wouldn’t be too surprised to see another reasonably big name in ed reform circles come in, such as Rudy Crew, former superintendent/chancellor in New York City and Miami, among others.  On the other hand, the expectation is that Kaya Henderson, Rhee’s deputy, will be named Interim Chancellor, and she could be an intriguing candidate, with stronger D.C. roots than Rhee. 

While some policy changes will be rolled back, I think some of Fenty and Rhee’s most positive and lasting legacies are the repairs made to all of the schools in the District, and the significant shortening of a maintenance backlog that had previously included broken windows that hadn’t been replaced in more than a decade in some schools.  These infrastructure pieces are generally seen as a total positive (though some critics pointed out that not all schools had their repairs done as quickly as others, or pointing out differences in how the district is handling the renovations of Wilson and Ballou High Schools).  A well-maintained school can make a statement to students about how much the community cares, and these facility upgrades, along with generally improved data systems, allow for more people to focus on the quality of education.  I think Gray will benefit from the fact that many of these changes have happened, and that the central administration of DCPS, while still far from a high-functioning organization, seems considerably more responsive than it previously was.  

As to the IMPACT system and other accountability measures put in place by Rhee, we’ll see how Mr. Gray approaches them.  The $75 million in federal Race to the Top funding will lock in a few systems, at least in the short term, and changes in federal education policy will continue to nudge DC in the accountability-based direction of many of Rhee’s reforms.  

While we don’t know yet how Mr. Gray’s vision for education reform will play out on the ground level, we do know that he has an understanding of building alliances and support that the outgoing administration certainly lacked, and so while he may not move as quickly as Fenty and Rhee did in the “no excuses” direction, he is also not likely to alienate the supporters of those steps by moving 180 degrees in the opposite direction, and he will also likely make some moves to keep some of the talent that was brought in with a strong inclination to help revamp D.C.’s failing schools.  Those retention efforts will be critical not only from a human capital standpoint (keeping talent), but also for basic continuity of operations of this complex and important system.

On the other hand, the huge budget gap facing D.C. government for the next fiscal year means he will have to make some tough choices about what to cut, and it is not likely that he will be able to make a lot of headway in the immediate term on his campaign promise to focus on “the entire educational spectrum” from Pre-K to community college and beyond.  

Any thoughts?

It seems odd that it wouldn’t come up in a 90-minute highly-anticipated meeting, but there it is:

D.C. Council Chairman Vincent C. Gray and Schools Chancellor Michelle A. Rhee met for 90 minutes today for what Gray called a “philosophical discussion” about public education but they did not talk about her future in the administration.

Following the highly anticipated meeting, Gray and Rhee emerged to face a throng of news cameras and reporters. While Gray spoke to reporters, a grim-faced Rhee stood to the side, refusing to answer questions or join the chairman in issuing a public statement.

Now here’s a silver-bullet solution for school reform. And also a way for Stras not to have to watch the Nats lose on the days he doesn’t pitch:

By Gary Babad July 16, 2010 (GBN News Washington Bureau) — While acclaimed Washington Nationals’ rookie Stephen Strasburg was not chosen for the All Star team as many had been advocating, he will be given another high-profile role.
D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty announced today that as of next week, Strasburg will be replacing Michelle Rhee as chancellor of D.C. public schools. The move came as a complete shock to just about everyone involved in the educational system.
Rhee had all but endorsed D.C. Mayor Fenty for re-election, indicating that she might not remain as chancellor if his opponent, D.C. Council Chairman Vincent Gray, unseats him. But the mayor is said to have concluded that, as much as he has supported the chancellor’s educational reforms, Strasburg is far more popular than the controversial Rhee and would provide a greater boost to his campaign…
Education Secretary Arne Duncan, a rabid basketball fan, is said to have favored LeBron Jamesfor the position.

If this mayoral race wasn’t already going to be a referendum on the DCPS leadership, it certainly is now!

Chancellor Michelle A. Rhee edged closer than ever Wednesday to saying explicitly that she’s out of here if Mayor Adrian M. Fenty loses his Sept. 14 primary contest against Council Chairman Vincent C. Gray. She told told WAMU’s Kavitha Cardoza that she has not seen in Gray the same commitment to education reform that Fenty has demonstrated. Rhee has been reluctant to talk about her future in the city under a new mayor. And Gray, for his part, says he would not decide whether to retain Rhee until he was elected. But Cardoza pressed Rhee, reminding her of past statements about the importance of parents being able to make informed decisions. “A lot of parents want to make their decision based on you,” Cardoza said. Rhee responded: “What I can tell you very clearly is I came to this city to take on this job specifically because I believed there was a really unique opportunity with this mayor and how focused he was on education. And he has not disappointed me one time in the last three years. I would not work under a mayor who was not focused on education in the same way and as dedicated to making some of the really difficult decisions.”

This is a pretty big victory for both Michelle Rhee and Washington Teacher’s Union president George Parker, who stuck his neck out on getting this finalized, after what seems like many years of negotiation.  

A new contract for D.C. public school teachers has been approved by an overwhelming margin, with 1,412 teachers voting in favor and 425 against. The votes, which were submitted by mail, phone and email, were tallied starting at 10 a.m. today. The new contract will give teachers raises of over 20 percent by 2012 and has been seen as one of the defining initiatives School Chancellor Michelle Rhee’s rocky tenure. The D.C. Council will vote on the contract next.

It will now be interesting to see if Council Chairman Vincent Gray uses this vote as another opportunity to try and thwart the Fenty administration.  It’s clear that Gray and Fenty do not share much commonality when it comes to the Rhee-led DCPS, but I don’t know whether the politics are right for the Chairman to block a potential $20,000 raise for teachers, regardless of its merit-pay component.

It’s not quite what Rhee and Co were looking for at the beginning of the process, but it offers the beginnings of a “voluntary” performance pay program (as well as a 21% across-the-board raise for DCPS teachers).  

 

The five-year contract, which would be retroactive to October 2007 and continue through September 2012, would mean an overall 21.6 percent rise in teachers’ base salary rates. But the most discussed parts of the proposal stand to be performance pay and the process for “excessed” teachers (i.e., those laid off from an overstaffed school), as well as the novel funding stream.
Not all teachers would be eligible for performance pay. Those seeking to participate would have to “qualify in” using an teaching evaluation process that is yet to be finalized. Unlike the ill-fated “green tier” proposal, teachers who participate in performance pay would not lose tenure protections; however, they would lose some rights should they be excessed by DCPS.
As for those teachers not in the performance pay program, those rated “effective” or better under the IMPACT evaluation system would have three options if excessed and unable to immediately find a new DCPS position: take a $25,000 cash buyout; retire with full benefits if a teacher has 20 years experience; or take an additional year to find a placement with DCPS assistance, after which they would be fired.

It will be interesting to see how many teachers vote with their feet by opting into the performance pay program, and whether it lines up with the predicted young/old split.  

Also, it looks like many of the usual suspects (including Eli Broad and the Waltons) are lining up to fund this investment, which may harden the battle lines further as it relates to the national ed reform conversation. 

The base salary raises and performance pay initiative are funded via nearly $65 million in private donations gathered by the D.C. Public Education Fund—-$10 million from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation; $10 million from the Broad Foundation; $19.5 million from the Robertson Foundation, and $25 million from the Walton Family Foundation. The money, according to documents, is devoted to the “recruitment, retention and rewarding of quality teachers.”

Either way, it’s nice to finally see an agreement in place, and as article author Mike DeBonis asks, it will be interesting to see how this plays out locally in the upcoming Fenty-Gray DC mayoral showdown.